PDA

View Full Version : Canonical Christianity / theological revival



Kosmas Damianides
17-05-2005, 04:57 PM
St Vladimir's Orthodox Theological Seminary - St Vladimir's Theological Quarterly

First Issue of the Quarterly
Florovsky: The Challenge of Our Time

Editorial The Challenge of Our Time

The great Russian bishop of the last century, Theophanes “The Recluse” (d. 1894), in one of his pastoral letters makes a startling statement. What the Russian Church most needed, he said, was “a band of firebrands,” which would set the world on fire. The incendiaries must be themselves burning and go around to inflame human minds and hearts. Theophanes did not trust a “residual Christianity.” Customs could be perpetuated by inertia, he said, but convictions and beliefs could be kept only by spiritual vigilance and continuous effort by the spirit. Theophanes felt that there was too much routine and convention in the life of Russian Christians. He anticipated a crisis and even a collapse. He resigned his diocese and retired to a monastery, because he felt that he could do much more service to the Church by writing books than by administering a bishopric.

Theophanes was a man of wide learning and experience. For some time he was Rector of the Theological Academy (in St. Petersburg). He traveled extensively in the Christian East and was intimately linked with Mount Athos. He was a good Greek scholar, and he used this knowledge for translations. He always insisted that he retired not for an advanced spiritual life (which is possible, and should be practiced for the ordinary life) but to have time and leisure for literary and scholarly work. He took to his monastic cell all his books, a selected library from which were not excluded books by Western scholars and secular literature. He wanted to know the world to which he had to bring the message of salvation. He did not dispute the labors and achievements of those who did not belong to the Orthodox communion of faith.

The retired bishop spent his time in writing: He translated “Philokalia,” [see Book Reviews ]; the works of St. Simeon the New Theologian; the ancient Monastic Rules (Eastern and Western); he published several volumes of his commentary on the Epistles of St. Paul, intended not so much for scholars, but to help all believers understand this inspired teaching; he wrote several books on Christian Ethics and Spirituality. Theophanes began every day with the Divine Liturgy, which he celebrated alone in his tiny domestic chapel, and he would use the inspiration of the daily communion for his scholarly and pastoral work.

The impact of Theophanes' writings on the life of the Russian Church was enormous. In his retirement, as a “recluse,” he was more influential than he could ever have been as administrator of a worldly diocese. He made Christian doctrine available for average Christians, for all Christians. He wanted to equip them with spiritual weapons for their Christian struggle. He required from all Christians — from clergy first of all — a thorough knowledge and understanding of our Holy Faith, which alone could save our life from unhealthy sentimentalism and imagination. He insisted on the study of the Scriptures and of the Holy Fathers.

Now, many years have passed since Theophanes' time. His worst anticipations were justified. The whole Orthodox Church — not only in Russia — is involved in a desperate struggle with the raging assault of godlessness and unbelief. Human souls are undergoing an incredible trial. But the protecting veil of Divine Mercy is spread over the suffering Church and the possessed world, and men are called to be Christ's witnesses: His Messengers and Apostles. The Church is essentially a missionary institution. One has to thank God for that army of new martyrs and confessors who have revealed or manifested the strength and the beauty of Christian Faith. And yet one should not be too easily satisfied with what has been done by others. So much has been left not done by us.

Let us confine our attention this time to one aspect of our Christian duty. Everyone knows that we are desperately short of books. Behind the “iron curtain” an impressive literature of atheism has been created and widely spread. Special colleges have been established to train people “for a godless ministry.” Textbooks on anti-religious propaganda, and on the methodology of godless preaching have been prepared for classrooms.

What is our response to this challenge? In the Ancient Church, the Holy Fathers met the challenge of the pagan world by an outpouring of Christian writings, attacking point by point the arguments of the opponents. What have we done in our own situation? Can we really meet the enemy on the field and save the victims of this unparalleled spiritual persecution?

The rusty weapons will not do. I am not speaking of the Holy Tradition, of the writings of the Holy Fathers, but of the inadequate books of the last century, which were so often ephemeral and rarely presented a sufficient interpretation of the Holy Tradition. Our theological production stopped years ago, and that stoppage testifies to our neglect of the teaching mission of the Church. Ignorance is growing in the Church and we are not alarmed!

Are there any books in which our Holy Orthodox Faith can be convincingly preached and commended to our own generation?

We in America, where the majority of Orthodox Christians are English-speaking, are in an especially difficult situation. There is no Orthodox literature in English. There are occasional books, often of modest quality, and rarely on the most urgent or basic subjects. The real problem, however, is not that of books, but of study. Each generation, especially in a new country, has to assess the Christian truth afresh, in continuous contact with the past, as well as in close contact with the changing present. It is not enough to learn by rote some ready answers. They may be perfectly right and correct. But we have to solve the questions by thinking through the answers and not by merely reciting formulas, sacred and perfect though they are. Listen to the searching man! He knows the formula, but cannot relate it to his existential questioning. Our Creed is a most perfect formula. How often do we recite it without conviction? Are we able to relate it to our urgent spiritual needs? How many Orthodox dispense with the Creed, because it has ceased to have for them any immediate spiritual appeal? The Creed is charged with an eternal and loving Truth. It is an eternal key to human unrest, but it needs interpretation. Otherwise we would not know how to fit the key in the lock.

What our present generation wants, especially in our country, is a true theological revival — a revival of a living theology, which would unlock for us that Truth which one can find in the Scriptures, in the Tradition, and in the Liturgical life of the Church, but which is sealed away from us by our ignorance and neglect. We need today more than ever before, precisely a “band of spiritual firebrands” who can inflame minds and hearts with the fire of a loving knowledge of God and Jesus Christ, the Redeemer. God calls us, in our generation, to be His witnesses and messengers. How can men believe if they do not hear the quickening Word? Even if we are men of unclean lips, let us respond to the Divine call, and the fire of the Spirit will cleanse us, for the ministry of the Word.

V. Rev. George Florovsky, D.D.

St. Vladimir's Seminary Quarterly , Vol. 1, No. 1, Fall 1952, pp. 3-5

Kosmas Damianides
17-05-2005, 05:33 PM
I think that too often we are side tracked by "other things" and stray from the right path. One could describe this path as "white noise" it's noise without any real meaning. If you turn on your TV or radio where there is no signal you get a hissing "FFFFFF", "SHSHSHSHSHSH" or "THTHTHTHTH" sound and black and white random dots on the TV. This is what is technically called "white noise".

There is no signal because either you made a mistake and put the radio or tv on the wrong station/frequency or being an insomniac you are unable to get any rest or propper sleep so you find there is no signal.

So what am I going on about? That is probably what you are asking yourselves by now. No i'm not going crazy.

Well God (Who is not transmitting radio/audio/video signals through the air) is in fact constantly transmitting his grace to us, it is a special frequency which is received by all of us. This pure divine grace is what makes us live breath and act as humans do.

What should happen however, if someone were to switch over to another frequency, a non-spiritual frequency which instead of making us feel good, actualy mades us worse, and worse, and worse; but we didn't know how to switch back to the good frequency, or did not have the courage to turn back to the one that had meaning and life....we would eventually die.

So what do we need to do? Look for Christ and cling onto Him. Do not let him go. We have to stay on the "Grace of God" station otherwise all we will be left with is "white noise"."ThThThThThThThThThThThThThThThThThThThThTh Th
ThThThThThThThThThThThThThThThThThThThThThThThThT
hThThThThThThThThThThThThThThThThThThThThThThThTh
Thanatos"http://www.monachos.net/mb/clipart/uhoh.gif

leandros
17-05-2005, 07:06 PM
"What our present generation wants, especially in our country, is a true theological revival - a revival of a living theology, which would unlock for us that Truth which one can find in the Scriptures, in the Tradition, and in the Liturgical life of the Church, but which is sealed away from us by our ignorance and neglect."

Now, maybe there is a misunderstanding here. "ignorance and neglect" is referring to a mind status. What is missing - if something is missing - is the purification of human hearts. The knowledge that would "unlock for us that Truth" is not the issue.

The "living theology" is not described in the books. It's the personal experience of "otherness" as a truth that prevails over "self circumscription".

What would be the result, if several thousand/millions of Christians would donate their time, their money, their "selves" to others without taking nothing in return.

What is missing is not to talk about the true faith. What is missing is to live according to true faith.

"He resigned his diocese and retired to a monastery, because he felt that he could do much more service to the Church by writing books than by administering a bishopric."

Well brothers, let me deny this argument.
Theophanes The Recluse, like St. Nikodimos from Mount Athos and all other Orthodox monks, was not an intellectual of faith. He was not withdrawn to "study" and to translate and to produce Holy books. Orthodox monks are living the practice of Orthodox faith by sanctifying themselves in constant and total prayer. Then, by having the same experiences with the ancient saints of the Church they also testify the same "living theology" as they did.

"How can men believe if they do not hear the quickening Word? Even if we are men of unclean lips, let us respond to the Divine call, and the fire of the Spirit will cleanse us, for the ministry of the Word."

This is an Augustinian doctrine: "how can someone believe in something that he does not know of?". It is not the Christian "theory" that is missing from "our present generation". It's the testimony from glorified Christians and their "theoria" (view) of God that is "missing".

Eventually, this testimony of "theoria of God" (meeting in person with God, in a clean human heart) is not missing, nor it will ever be absent.

Our self justification of thinking about ourselves, that we are the bearers of the truth, of the tradition and that we are "His witnesses and messengers" is the same old mistake that we do along with almost everybody else.

"Even if we are men of unclean lips, let us respond to the Divine call, and the fire of the Spirit will cleanse us, for the ministry of the Word." NO sir, He will not "cleanse us, for the ministry of the Word"

Of course the Spirit accomplishes our semi-finished human work, of course He strengthens our faint works, but we are not worthy of calling ourselves teachers in faith as long as we are either in the stage of repentance, or in the stage of purification.

Only Glorified members of the Body of Church are able to guide others into Faith in an apathetic (passionless) way.

For, "if a blind guides another blind they will both end up falling into a scarp".

Have faith, God has not abandon us.

Kosmas Damianides
18-05-2005, 06:16 PM
Dear Leandros,

Fr. Florovsky wrote: "How can men believe if they do not hear the quickening Word? Even if we are men of unclean lips, let us respond to the Divine call, and the fire of the Spirit will cleanse us, for the ministry of the Word."

You wrote: "NO sir, He will not "cleanse us, for the ministry of the Word."

First of all , brrother, I know where you are coming from. But.......!
The Very Rev Florovsky here is writing a pastoral letter to the faithful and particularly to students of Theology. In his closing remarks, he is (it seems) encouraging them not to be hyper-sensitive to their un-worthiness. This hyper-sensitivity can be an obstacle for many sensitive and God fearing Christians. There needs to be a balance in life. God's grace works even in the unworthy and unclean who wish to be perfect ministers of God. (eg. "O Lord my God, how well I know that I am unworthy that You should enter under the roof of my soul; but since in Your love for mankind You will to
dwell in me, I take courage and approach." Communion Prayer -- St John Chrysostom)

So we need to understand that God is a loving God and as Leandros correcty pointed out, if we do half of the work, then God will do the rest.

Leandros wrote:<font size="+1">"Of course the Spirit accomplishes our semi-finished human work, of course He strengthens our faint works, but we are not worthy of calling ourselves teachers in faith."</font>

So I think Leandros you also have to understand the context in which this article was written.

No Orthodox Christian in his or her right mind would agree that an unrepentant minister would be able to serve God and be cleansed without first repenting.

In fact there are examples in the lives of the monastic Fathers where God would either intercede and stop the Liturgy

eg "Once there were two monks a deacon-monk and a priest-monk. but they had such hidden resentment for each other that God removed the paten in the middle of preparation of Holy communion, it just flew out of the window.

Other times God struck these unworthy ministers dead, dumb, mute or blind. Even a chanter once lost his voice in one instant due to his pride and disobedience.

An other time an unworthy priest went into the alter but his shadow did not follow him and a man standing outside saw all this, he also observed that after the priest left the altar, the shadow re-attached to him and folowed him. perhaps God (who knows the future) waited for his repentance.

I think that these examples show us that the ministry of priesthood or deaconate or chanter or reader or theologian (wha ever the case) is not a light thing and that God has his ways in dealing with us in different ways, depending on the situation and on the person.

I have other things to add but I hope you the members will give your own ideas on this subject.

With lots of Love In Christ

Kosmas

Byron Jack Gaist
18-05-2005, 07:05 PM
Dear Kosmas,

Thank you for the words of encouragement and the wonderful stories, I especially enjoyed the one about the unworthy priest and his shadow. I wonder, do you have a reference for that one?

In Christ
Byron

Anestis Jordanoglou
18-05-2005, 08:46 PM
Leandros,

Living theology is how Florovsky describes &#34;living the Faith&#34; which purifies the heart.

Ignorance and negligence describes the luke-warm, at best, apathetic, at worst, attitude of members of the Church in this country who have often viewed the Church as an ornament to their ethnic identity, rather than the other way around - old world ethnicity enhancing Orthodoxy while slowly morphing into an American Orthodoxy.

The lack of spiritual writings or books in the new world represent this apathetic attitude which leads to the demise of the Church.

Your view of monasticism and spiritual writing is dualistic. One informs the other, they do not exist as seperate entities. Spiritual treastises are written in this context &#40;as I&#39;m sure you well know&#41; The fact that so few are written in this country is an appropriate concern when taking this into account. So Florovsky is correct.

Listening to the quickening Word of God refers to the missionary nature that the Church must adopt in a society that isn&#39;t touched by it in any real way. You can&#39;t meet God if you haven&#39;t been introduced to Him.

&#34;Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing hem in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you, and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age&#34; &#40;Matthew 28:19-20&#41; &#34;and they went out and preached everywhere, the Lord working wih them and confirming the word through the accompanying signs. Amen&#34; &#40;Mark 16:20&#41;

The Gospel Reading in the Baptism Service is in fact the passage from Matthew 28. The Church orients the person to our sharing the Good News from the very day of our birth, in this case the proclamation being our very Baptism and Chrismation itself.

&#34;NO sir, He will not &#34;cleanse us, for the ministry of the Word.&#34;

Read Isaiah 6:5-9. God would only do so with Isaiah and not us? Why? How about St. Paul - originally persecutor of Christian who had a &#34;thorn in his side&#34; throughout his life? Only Christ is perfect - not even the Saints are. Regardless, we are called to be Saints, &#34;to be perfect as My Father is perfect&#34;

The burning coal which blots out iniquities and allows Isaiah do go to the people is referred to by St John Chrysostom as a prototype of the Holy Eucharist &#40;Holy Cross Press - Vaporis &#34;Daily Prayers for Orthodox Christians - pg 84&#41;, I think St Basil does also in one of his prayers in Bishop Nicolas Papanikolao&#39;s Patristic Prayers book &#40;as I recall&#41;

So Communion is the burning coal that allows us to proclaim Him in love to our family in Christ and those who have not heard of Him or our Faith.

This is not to say we are worthy of anything. We are not. But we are to take on the yoke and bear the Cross. It&#39;s our responsibility as Christians.

Kosmas Damianides
19-05-2005, 07:15 PM
Thank you Anesti,http://www.monachos.net/mb/clipart/happy.gif

That was very enlightening. The book of Isaiah the prophet is sometimes called the 5th Gospel because he tells us many things about Jesus and Christianity before He was even born.

Indeed it is our responsability and duty as Christians to lift up our cross daily.

leandros
19-05-2005, 10:18 PM
Dear brothers and sisters,

My reaction to Fr. Florovsky's "Challenge of our time" is mainly in opposition to his rhetorical question : "Are there any books in which our Holy Orthodox Faith can be convincingly preached and commended to our own generation?", which, I thing, is the basis of his analysis of the published quotation from Kosmas Damianides. In Fr. Florovsky's text there is a honest intimation that Faith has to be presented in a "convincingly preached and commended" way or else it will fail to be convincing.

This is a logical conclusion. A theory has to be presented with in a convincing way, and has to be presented in way that will make it comprehensible to "our own generation" by using our language and our contemporary tools of communication. I understand this comes from his anguish as he expressed it by saying: "What is our response to this challenge? In the Ancient Church, the Holy Fathers met the challenge of the pagan world by an outpouring of Christian writings, attacking point by point the arguments of the opponents. What have we done in our own situation? Can we really meet the enemy on the field and save the victims of this unparalleled spiritual persecution?"

I do not have any intention to question Fr. Florovsky's motives or his genuine concern to provide a motive to the readers, in order to alarm them of their failures. For that He said: "Our theological production stopped years ago, and that stoppage testifies to our neglect of the teaching mission of the Church. Ignorance is growing in the Church and we are not alarmed!"

But he was grown to offer as a solution a methodology that is driving to the secularization of the Church catechesis, as he said: "... The real problem, however, is not that of books, but of study...It is not enough to learn by rote some ready answers. They may be perfectly right and correct. But we have to solve the questions by thinking through the answers and not by merely reciting formulas, sacred and perfect though they are. He knows the formula, but cannot relate it to his existential questioning. Our Creed is a most perfect formula. How often do we recite it without conviction? Are we able to relate it to our urgent spiritual needs? How many Orthodox dispense with the Creed, because it has ceased to have for them any immediate spiritual appeal? The Creed is charged with an eternal and loving Truth. It is an eternal key to human unrest, but it needs interpretation. Otherwise we would not know how to fit the key in the lock."

It seems to me that, Fr. Florovsky concludes that we (Christians) have to provide this "interpretation" for the non-Christians brothers so that they can also obtain the insider's interpretation of the knowledge that we possess. As long as we miscarry such a possession ("Even if we are men of unclean lips"), the Spirit will provide our purification ("the fire of the Spirit will cleanse us"), "for the sake of the ministry of the Word".

The point of Fr. Florovsky's Editorial constitutes from the following arguments:

A)Christian Faith as stated in Church teachings and writings and from Church tradition, in the past, is charged with an eternal and loving Truth. It is an eternal key to human unrest, but it needs interpretation. Otherwise we would not know how to fit the key in the lock.

B)In our times, this interpretation is not provided from Christians to non-Christians in a "convincingly preached and commended way to our own generation".

C)Christians, as the bearers of such an interpretation, ought to manifest it to non-Christians as being themselves the current communicational media that non-Christians can understand.

D)Human's impurity will be purified by the Spirit for the sake of the ministry of the Word.

With this correct logical sequence that concludes in a honest answer for a substantial problem, Fr. Florovsky unintentionally goes into a path that is out of Orthodox Christian Tradition: He makes the mishit to follow the logical doctrine that the message is more important than the messenger ("message" being the Faith, and "messenger" being Christ). Fr. Florovsky wonders in this context: "How can men believe if they do not hear the quickening Word?"

In Orthodox tradition, the messenger is far more important than the message , actually is the Only importance. This strict distinction is regarded as a fundamental distinction of created and uncreated realities.

In Orthodox Tradition's context, it is the unwillingness of humans to surrender themselves to the non-existed (by human conception) uncreated Realities, which makes them unable to relate with Them personally.

As Lord said (Matthew 13:10-17):
10And the disciples came and said to Him, "Why do You speak to them in parables?"
11Jesus answered them, "To you it has been granted to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it has not been granted.
12"For whoever has, to him more shall be given, and he will have an abundance; but whoever does not have, even what he has shall be taken away from him.
13"Therefore I speak to them in parables; because while seeing they do not see, and while hearing they do not hear, nor do they understand.
14"In their case the prophecy of Isaiah is being fulfilled, which says, you will keep on hearing, but will not understand; you will keep on seeing, but will not perceive;
15for the heart of this people has become dull, with their ears they scarcely hear, and they have closed their eyes, in the hope off they would see with their eyes, hear with their ears, and understand with their heart and return, and I would heal them.
16" But blessed are your eyes, because they see; and your ears, because they hear.
17"For truly I say to you that many prophets and righteous men desired to see what you see, and did not see it, and to hear what you hear, and did not hear it.

Believe it or not, as this seems a non-logical methodology of manifesting unseen and unheard realities to "deaf" and "blind" people by make them even more incomprehensible for them, it is the only methodology that the Church is using in providing therapy to ill human souls. This is an everyday practice as lived by Church members since the Pentecost day.

In this context, Fr. Florovsky's analysis is a victim of secularization of Church.

I believe that the love for the fellowman drove Fr. Florovsky, and other Christians, to respond to ill fellowmen's requests for Truth, Light and Life, according to their petitions. But if you shine the Light to a blind man's eyes he will still see darkness. First, he has to realize that he is blind, then to go to the hospital, then to receive therapy and then to enjoy the Light with his healthy eyes. Orthodox therapeutically tradition calls this path: repentance, illumination, deification.

That is why Christ, our Lord, said "... Therefore I speak to them in parables; because while seeing they do not see, and while hearing they do not hear, nor do they understand ... for the heart of this people has become dull, with their ears they scarcely hear, and they have closed their eyes, in the hope off they would see with their eyes, hear with their ears, and understand with their heart and return, and I would heal them."

Fr Raphael Vereshack
19-05-2005, 11:08 PM
It is useful to keep in mind that the message of Fr George Florovsky and those of his generation was shaped at least in part by the social chaos which the Church endured in the 20th century. This was a time- from the First World War to the Russian Revolution to the rise of fascism & the Depression and then the Second World War- of deep crisis & trauma for society on every level and this deeply affected the life of the Church. Due to this there was little stability in Church life from 1914 until well after 1945; a period of over thirty years which in fact had lasting effects way beyond this time.
Due to the extreme difficulties of this period the most basic theological education and activities connected with this almost disappeared entirely. Here in North America there was no Orthodox seminary from about 1918 until 1938- imagine what the Church had to do for 20 years with nowhere to go for theological training! &#40;Some went to Jordanville or St. Tikhon&#39;s at least to learn how to do the services&#41; So this meant that very little beyond the extreme basics was published. And parish life which is the seed bed of seminarians were mostly in survival mode. So it was extremely difficult in this environment to devote much time to theological considerations and it is this situation which I think at least partly Fr George and his generation address. To understand just how deeply this affected the Church the situation only really began to change to the conditions we now know in the 1970s. &#40;In 1979 our Skete in Canada which used English for services had three books in total! One Mother Mary book for the Sunday Octoechos which we would keep repeating through the week. The Melkite book of Archbishop Raya for tropars & kondaks for the saint of the day. And the old faithful Hapgood book.&#41;So many saintly pioneers have gone before us in such incredibly trying circumstances that it is a miracle if there is even a church present for us to attend. So we have to be patient and in turn pray that God uses us as a good foundation for future generations.
In Christ- Fr Raphael