Rapture

[Gideon]

Watching TV just now, come across Jack Van Impe's program and found him quoting the Church Fathers. Did St. Ephrim declare a pre trib rapture? Did any of the Fathers or latter Catholic/Orthodox believe in pre trib rapture?

[John Curtis Dunn]

Watching TV just now, come across Jack Van Impe's program and found him quoting the Church Fathers. Did St. Ephrim declare a pre trib rapture? Did any of the Fathers or latter Catholic/Orthodox believe in pre trib rapture?

Remember that even Satan quoted the Fathers (The writings of the Old Testament) to Christ in the Wilderess. Do no be taken in by this deception, this man has no love for the Fathers.

john

[Richard Leigh]

No. The idea that a "rapture" could precede the apostacy or the great tribulation only occurred to anyone in the 19th century.

It originated in a "prophecy" of a Scotish woman who was physically ill at the time, and it was enlarged into a puative biblically doctrinal base by Darby, one time Anglican priest who became founder of the Plymouth Brethren. The doctrine is the start of dispensationalism.

Some fathers otoh taught what is known as a "historical pre-mil" second coming, i.e., that the Lord would return and set up his Kingdom of Heaven on Earth (New Jerusalime, I suppose, would land on the old one) where He would reign for a thousand years, but as I recall, this was post trib, and as you can see, non-rapture.

Richard

[Rick Burns]

I have posted some links on our mission website that can help with this topic.

http://www.saintig.org/inquirer.html

[Justin]

Just a note, the "Kingdom of Heaven on Earth" (1000 year literal earthly reign) doctrine is considered a heresy. From what I've read, it's the reason the 2nd Ecumenical Council added "And His kingdom shall have no end." I believe it was the Apollinarians who held to this belief at the time of the 2nd Ecumenical Council, though according to Arch. Averky, many early Fathers such as Justin Martyr, Hippolytus, and Ireneaus believed in a modified form of this doctrine.

[Inquirer]

So what about the fathers that did believe in a millennarian reign? What are we to make of this, if this idea is heresy?

[Richard Leigh]

In his Dialogue with Trypho, Justin (mid 2nd Cent.) stated that it was an opinion which many did not hold. It is known that Papias held it, but it was not taught as dogma. It was "in the air" until a decision was reached later. When reached, it was not longer an "open question."

So, we are to think that those who held the opinion were wrong about it.

Richard

[Heather M]

Hi again---

I know this is an old thread, but I found a good article about the rapture. It was quite a shock to me to learn that the rapture was false. I had been fed this belief all my life in church, I can even remember learning of it in Sunday school as a child.... I found this article a while ago...and readily handed over any left-over beliefs of this doctrine.

www.holycross-hermitage.com/pages/Orthodox_Life/rapture1.htm (http://www.holycross-hermitage.com/pages/Orthodox_Life/rapture1.htm)

You know, I first went to an Orthodox Church about a year and a half ago...and for the first about 10 months all I did was look for everything I could about how the Protestant church was wrong, instead of focusing on how much I was wrong. I wasted so much time...(even though I now have binders full of articles and findings of so many different things...) It is only now, that as I go back and sort through everything, that I realise what valuable information that i had found for my own spiritual benefit....not just to disprove prior beliefs that I once held. The most valuable information lies in the paragraphs and sentences that I did not underline and highlight, and just skimmed over.

>>yawn<< I think I'll go to sleep now...(yes John K, I do sometimes sleephttp://www.monachos.net/mb/clipart/proud.gif)---but it will be tough tonight....my air conditioner seems to have quit blowing cold air. I live in Florida, and it's very very hot already---been in the upper 90s. And of course! this happened on Friday, and a holiday weekend too...so the manager won't be around to have it fixed until Tuesday at best....

with much love
-heather

[Michelle]

what does the church say about the rapture?

[Baroness]

The &#34;Rapture&#34; is a protestant christian image that has arisen only over the past 100 years! From memory, Orthodox Christianity teaches there will not be a &#34;Rapture&#34; of the Christian beleivers before the anti-christ comes, as the protestant christians teach. There is only the 2nd Coming of Christ and then follows the Great Judgement etc.

Protestants get the idea of the Rapture from the Scripture: &#34;Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air... &#40;I Thess. 4:17&#41;&#34;.

Please forgive me for the following statement, but ... before I became Orthodox, I had been brought up in the protestant church and grew up with these notions etc. I even went to Bible College, and learned about the &#34;Rapture&#34;. But ... when reading these Scripture passages, the Rapture didn&#39;t make sense to me! My teacher would say in regards to the Scriptures about the Rapture and 2nd Coming: &#34;one says the Christians will be caught up, and the second Scripture says Christ will come to the earth ... there is a difference, therefore there is a Rapture!&#34; I didn&#39;t agree inside my head - to me - it seemed like the Rapture was in fact, Christ&#39;s 2nd Coming - though not stepping on the earth, He was still appearing in the clouds, which is a part of the earth. Therefore, the Scripture telling of the 2nd Coming, where Christ sets foot on the earth as we know it was in essence really a 3rd Coming of Christ ... so you see, it didn&#39;t make sense to me. And that was one of the first things that started the beginning of my journey to Orthodoxy.

I&#39;m sure there are useful websites, books, and teachings that will give you in-depth information about what the Orthodox say in regards to the &#34;Rapture&#34;. So please forgive me for my nonsense, if it doesn&#39;t make sense.

Here at least are some interesting and helpful articles:

&#40;About the Rapture&#41;
http://www.orthodoxonline.com/leftb ehind.htm (http://www.orthodoxonline.com/leftbehind.htm)

http://www.holycross-hermitage.com/ pages/Orthodox_Life/rapture1.htm (http://www.holycross-hermitage.com/pages/Orthodox_Life/rapture1.htm)

&#40;About the Second Coming&#41;
http://www.fatheralexander.org/book lets/english/end_w.htm#_Toc26622232 (http://www.fatheralexander.org/booklets/english/end_w.htm#_Toc26622232)

[James F.]

I don't believe in the Pre-Tribulation Rapture...Anymore. But there are some things I don't understand in regards to the Great Tribulation. Our Lord said that we will have tribulation many times in Scripture. But it also says in 1 Thessalonians 5:9 that God has not appointed us to wrath, but for obatining salvation in Jesus Christ. Now, I believe that this is referring to the ultimate wrath of God, which is Hell. But I also believe that the Great Tribulation, in some points, not all, is a picture of the wrath of God. As an examle; the seven seals, the seven trumpets, and the seven vials are all the wrath of God/the Lamb. Since believers are not destined for God's wrath, how shall we escape these things? I don't believe, as somone told me a long time ago, that the wrath of God on the wicked, is the same as the discipline of God on the righteous. I believe the wrath of God is for unbelievers during the Tribulation, and for unbelievers at the Judgement Seat of the Almighty when He sentences them to an eternity in the lake of fire. But how can Christians escape God's wrath upon the earth?

[Owen Jones]

Discerning the distinctions between literal statements and figurative statements in Scripture is a necessary component of spiritual growth, development and maturation. The inability of the catechumen to make such distinctions was the reason why they were not permitted to hear the sermon or receive the Eucharist. Through ascetical development, the eyes and the ears are opened and the deeper meaning of Scripture is revealed. It is not a gnostic secret, in the sense that we think of gnosticism as a heresy, but there is a gnosis which almost all of the Fathers speak of that is a necessary and inevitable outgrowth of ascetic development.

Matters pertaining to the apocalypse, second coming, etc. seem to me to be almost entirely in the symbolic and figurative realm. When the Bible says "thou shalt not commit adultery," that's what it literally means. Although even there, there is a symbolic and figurative meaning that can be added to that --- don't be a prostitute and a whore in your beliefs and actions!

Christ appearing in the clouds is most probably not to be understood in a literal sense. But "modern" Christianity is notorious for reducing all Scripture to literalistic interpretation, which requires that many passages simply be glossed over and left not-underlined.

Beware of the presumption that you know the true meaning of a symbolic passage, or that you have exhausted the meaning.

[M.C. Steenberg]

It's a great pleasure to see you round about the place again, Owen. I've been secretly waiting for your comments on the rather lively and for the most part very interesting The Son's knowing the hour (http://www.monachos.net/forum/showthread.php?t=2702) thread.

I appreciated very much your comments here on the ascetical basis for approaching and comprehending the symbolic meaning of scripture. One comment in particular struck me:


Christ appearing in the clouds is most probably not to be understood in a literal sense. But "modern" Christianity is notorious for reducing all Scripture to literalistic interpretation, which requires that many passages simply be glossed over and left not-underlined.

Setting aside for the moment the question of just what 'appearing in the clouds' might mean (I think that the hymns of the feast of the ascension are a necessary help in reading this part of scripture), it's the comment that '"modern" Christianity is notorious for reducing all Scripture to literalistic interpretation' that is useful. I'm particularly interested also in the flip-side of this: there is, in fact, also a deeply held interest in the symbolic, or the figurative, dimension of scripture in today's world. But the problem with this is precisely its lack of ascetical framework, which was your point elsewhere in your post. It is a kind of approach to the symbolic that is framed in as an intellectual project. The more one thinks about the text, draws cross-references and historical connections, etc., the more those symbols are revealed. To some degree this is true (e.g. an awareness of the Roman situation in the middle of the first century, as revealing much of the outward symbolism of St John's Apocalypse); but the inner meaning of such things is really an ascetical project. This does not mean it is anti-intellectual (we have had several discussions over the years on the fact that asceticism and intellectual activity are not mutually-exclusive opposites); but that the intellect must be forged ascetically for it to ascertain the real value of these aspects to the written word.

INXC, Matthew

[Matthew Panchisin]

Dear Matthew,

It is good to see Owen back, I was hoping that he and our friend Richard Mcbride would participate in the recent threads. Perhaps you could send him an email and let him know that his participation is requested? I would, but I do not have his email address.

In Christ,

Matthew Panchisin

[Tim Grass]

I liked Heather M.'s link earlier in this thread..... so I'm posting it here in case other people want to read it. --tim


Reprinted From Orthodox Life Vol. 45, No1 - January - February 1995

WILL YOU MEET THE LORD
IN THE "RAPTURE" OR IN REALITY?




Then we which are alive and remain
shall be caught up together with them in the clouds
to meet the Lord in the air...
(I Thess. 4:17)



When we put together the concept of being caught up into the clouds to meet the Lord in the air together with the idea of an instantaneous transformation, the result is spine-tingling. We will suddenly one day just blast off into space... The hope of the Rapture is a very practical force in my life... It motivates me to win as many to Christ as possible before it is too late. I want to take as many with me as I can. Although I grieve over the lost world that is headed toward catastrophe, the hope of the Rapture keeps me from despair in the midst of ever worsening world conditions.

(Hal Lindsey, The Rapture)1

Then, when the Antichrist is about to come, there will be many false christs and false prophets... So if the righteous were not sober-minded, even they would be deceived. But, behold, I have foretold these things to you; you have no excuse, for it is within your power not to be deceived...

...at the Second Coming He [Christ] will appear in a twinkling of an eye. And as the eagles, that is, the vultures, swiftly converge on a corpse, so to all the saints, who soar in the heights, will come where Christ will be and they will be snatched up into the clouds as the eagles.

(The Explanation by Blessed Theophylact of The Holy Gospel According to Matthew, ch. 23, verses 23-28)2

Whether our end comes during the reign of Antichrist or before, it is a certainty that the earthly life of each one of us will end. For all those who consider themselves to be Christians there is an expectation that if they have believed in Christ and have been faithful to His precepts they will in some manner meet the Lord and remain eternally in His presence.

As the culmination of Christian faith it is crucial that we understand first what Saint Paul was referring to by the phrase to he caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air, who in fact are those who will meet the Lord, and finally how one must truly prepare for this meeting. The differences in approach, attitude and belief between Protestant and Orthodox teachings on the Second Coming of Christ, our resurrection, and our means of sanctification as reflected in the above quotations reveal the great abyss separating the two faiths. Examining the Protestant-inspired doctrine of the Rapture allows us not only to develop an appropriate Orthodox Christian response to preparation for the reign of Antichrist, but also to soberly prepare for our own death. We will realize that the hope of "meeting the Lord" rests not in a simple proclamation of belief in Christ and acceptance of Him as Saviour within a community of like-minded "believers," but that the power of a discerning Orthodox Christian and his hope of meeting the Lord rest in the sacramental life of the true Church, in the worthy partaking of the actual Body and Blood of Jesus Christ, for it is through this partaking that we in reality meet the Lord, now and forever.

As outlandish and sensationalistic as Hal Lindsey's above comments may seem to some, they tap into a very strong current in American religious thought - apocalypticism and prophecy belief. Memories of the FBI's fiery confrontation in Waco, Texas almost two years ago with David Koresh, a Bible-quoting prophet of the apocalypse and his Branch Davidian followers still linger in our nation's consciousness. According to Gallup polls 62% of Americans believe that Jesus will literally return to earth, and there is a thriving audience eager to keep abreast of the latest insights of self-professed biblical interpreters as to how current historical events, i.e., wars, earthquakes, world financial crises, etc., portend the imminent return of Christ to rescue "believers" from the disasters brew ing on earth.3

The Rapture is just such a scheme for rescuing believers. It was a belief first espoused by John Nelson Darby, a 19th century British Plymouth Brethren preacher, and had a heavy influence on such prominent American Protestants as the evangelist D. L. Moody, founder of the Moody Bible Institute, C. I. Scofield, compiler of the Scofield Reference Bible, and the popular evangelist Billy Sunday, not to mention his present-day counterpart, Billy Graham. Indeed, Wacker claims, "it was the unique version of premillennialism nurtured by Darby and brought to these shores after the Civil War that helped form the doctrinal core of virtually all fundamentalist and many evangelical churches."4

While there are a number of variations in the details of the doctrine, (chiefly concerning when the Rapture will occur with respect to the Tribulation) as Lindsey notes, all who literally interpret the Bible believe in the fact of the Rapture. The doctrine of the Rapture is based on an interpretation of I Thessalonians 4:17 and refers to the coming of Christ for the Church in which He will instantly snatch up all living believers to meet Him in the air and translate them into immortal bodies without experiencing physical death.

A major reason for the popularity of this doctrine is that in a book on the Rapture you will not find much discussion of what happens to a person after he dies. Wacker observes, "Prophecy belief... allayed the fear of death. Hope for the resurrection life always had been an integral part of the Christian message. But this version of premillennialism offered a more radical promise: that the saints who were alive in Christ at the time of the Rapture would be spared the sting of death entirely." In his book The Rapture Hal Lindsey fairly gushes out the words, "The truly electrify ing fact is that many of you who are reading this will experience this mystery. You will never know what it is to die physically."5

All who believe in the Rapture are premillennialists, that is, they believe that Jesus will return to earth and set up a 1,000 year earthly king dom followed by a final judgment where all unbelievers will be condemned. This idea of a 1,000 year earthly kingdom is known as chiliasm (from the Greek chiliasmos, a thousand years) and was condemned as a heresy by the Orthodox Church in 381. Formally it is based on a misinterpretation of the twentieth chapter of Revelation which speaks of the souls.. who lived with Christ a thousand years (20:4). Archbishop Averky in commenting on this verse writes:
From this it is clear that these saints who participate in the thousand-year reign of Christ are reigning with Christ and per forming judgment not on earth but in heaven, for it speaks here only concerning their souls which are not yet united with their bodies. From these words it is evident that the Saints take part in the governing of the Church of Christ on earth, and therefore it is natural and proper to appeal to them with prayers, asking their intercession before Christ with Whom they reign.6
Fr. Seraphim Rose forcefully refutes the notion of the Rapture and a millennial kingdom saying:
The Second Coming of Christ will be unmistakable: it will be sudden, from heaven and it will mark the end of this world.There can be no preparation for it save only the Orthodox Christian preparation of repentance, spiritual life, and watchfulness. Those who are preparing for it in any other way who say that he is anywhere here who preach that Jesus is coming soon without warning of the great deception that is to precede His Coming: are clearly the prophets of Antichrist, the false Christ who must come first and deceive the world, including all Christians who are not or do not become truly Orthodox. There is to be no future millennium. For those who can receive it, the millennium of the Apocalypse is now; the life of Grace is the Orthodox Church for the whole thousand years between the First Coming of Christ and the time of Antichrist. That Protestants should expect the millennium in the future is only their confession that they do not live in it in the present -that is, that they are outside the Church of Christ and have not tasted of Divine Grace.7
A brief discussion of the Rapture will show how valid Father Seraphim's last words are. For instance, how does one become one of the believers taken up in the Rapture? One is made worthy by simply (verbally) accepting Christ as his Saviour and trusting that his sins are washed away by virtue of Christ dying on the Cross - the doctrine of substitutionary atonement. As Billy Graham writes, "You do not have to do some wonderful thing to be saved. All you have to do is accept the wonderful thing Christ has done for you. After you have this assurance in your heart, tell other people about it. Also show by your daily life that Christ has changed you for His own glory."8

Precious little else seems to be necessary to be taken up with Christ and accorded the blessings of eternal life. According to Lindsey, "We need not fear being judged by the Lord for the result of substitutionary atonement is we can't be condemned. The significance of all this as far as achieving victory over the flesh is concerned is that it gives us the right motivation for living for Christ. We don't have to walk in fear of being condemned and disowned for our sins. Satan just loves to get the Christian focused inward upon his sins and failures. Our motivation must not be duty, obligation, or fear of rejection."'

The Protestant path to sanctification then involves no sense of struggle with sin, hence no need for real repentance, and no need for the Sacraments in order to be united with Christ for eternity.

Furthermore, the Rapture is an eschatological doctrine, one that by definition should be concerned with death, judgment and the future of the soul. Yet books dealing with the Rapture devote very little space to these topics. There is little discussion about heaven or hell, indeed one cannot help but come to the conclusion that Christians who accept this doctrine are completely disassociated from the heavenly realm. From the beginning Protestantism has been so bound to the sensual world and the rational mind that it cannot accept the notion that one, for example, can pray for the dead or petition the saints in prayer. Lutheran scholars writing to the Patriarch of Constantinople in 1580 stated:
Therefore it is necessary for the living to pray for the living; and consequently, they can accomplish something. For we also pray for one another; and we are convinced, or rather, we per ceive by reality that our prayer shall be heard. Therefore, this example cannot properly be applied to the saints who have died. For the saints, when they die, even if they indeed live in the pres ence of God according to the testimony of Christ, yet it does not follow from this that they know specifically each thing that was done by us on earth...
Given this Protestant preoccupation with the carnal, it should be no surprise then to read Billy Graham's idea of what the world to come will look like:
It boggles the mind to try to imagine the kind of earth it is going to be when God eliminates the devil and sin. Our minds are staggered at the thought of 'Christ on the throne.' The great southward moving Sahara Desert of Africa will bloom and blossom. Mankind will be able to grow new foods; land that today is useless will grow twelve crops a year. The urge in man's heart toward immorality will have vanished. In that day the great drive in man will be a thirst for righteousness. It takes a great deal of faith in these days of despondency to believe this, but it is the clear teaching of the Bible.11
This vision is no more than a projection of an earthly kingdom and reflects how ill-prepared Protestants are for the real life after death, and hence why so many are eager to accept any doctrine that lets them think they can avoid it.

The Orthodox Church on the other hand is rich in information about the afterlife. Let us first consider how Saint Paul's words from Thessalonians (from which the idea of the Rapture is derived) are interpreted in the light of Orthodox Tradition. This moment is most definitely understood as the Second Coming of Christ and is immediately followed by the Last Judgment when all mankind will be assigned to their eternal resting places in either heaven or hell, depending on how they have conducted themselves in this life. At this time all people will be resurrected, and their souls reunited with their bodies; however, not all are going to be resurrected to glory. The New Testament mentions two different kinds of resurrection by use of Greek words that translate to "resurrection" and to "resurrection-from- out-of." Saint Theophylact of Bulgaria writes, "Whereas all men will be resurrected, but all will not have the... (resurrection-from-out-of). Indeed the sinners remain down on earth, awaiting the Judge. But the saints and the just, when they are gloriously resurrected, are caught up in the clouds, high in the air, in order to meet the Lord coming from the heavens to judge the world. For it is said: Then we who are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air ( I Thess. 4:17)."12 How does one become one of those caught up? St. Nicodemus of the Holy Mountain states, "It should be noted that the glory and Grace of the Holy Spirit which the souls of the saints receive even while they are here... this same glory will cover and clothe their bare bodies in the resurrection and make them to be caught up to heaven."13 Saint Nicholas Cabasilas is even more specific:
Those who have the body of Christ within them will rush to Christ with an irresistible motion in order that they may receive their proper place. Accordingly Paul, as he shows that this rush cannot be restrained, called it a carrying up [rapture], for he says, we shall be carried off in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air... So they will move from one table to another, from that which is still veiled to that which is already manifested, from the bread to the Body. While they still live the human life Christ is bread for them, and He is their passover for they pass from here to the city which is in heaven... This earthly banquet brings us to that Body. Apart from it we cannot receive the Body, any more than it is possible for one to look at the light whose eyes have been gouged out... Accordingly, those who depart this life without the Eucharistic gifts will have nothing for that life. But those who have been able to receive the Grace and preserve it have entered into the joy of the Lord.14
So those who have worthily partaken of Communion and guarded that Grace will stand to glorify Christ at the Second Coming and will be in His presence for eternity. And what does it mean to worthily partake of Communion? St. Theodore of Studium admonishes us: "He who defiles his flesh is not a member of Christ; he who is rancorous is not a member of Christ and is unworthy of Communion; and neither is he who nourishes any other passion a member of Christ. Therefore everyone must examine himself and thus not be impure and rancorous. When he is cleansed and corrected through confession, then let him partake of the Body and Blood of Christ."15

In contrast to Protestantism as we said, Orthodox Tradition is full of material on the life to come. How vitally important it is for us to heed St. Theodore's words on struggling with the passions and living an earthly life of repentance becomes apparent when we consider what the Orthodox Church teaches on the soul after death.

There will be a Last Judgment of all men at the Lord's Second Coming where each will receive either their reward or punishment, but previous to this, each person at their death will go through a particular judgment and pass through the toll-houses. We find in the book, The Soul After Death:
After our redemption by Jesus Christ, "all who have openly rejected the Redeemer comprise the inheritance of satan: their souls, after the separation from the body, descend straight to hell. But Christians who are inclined to sin are also unworthy of being immediately translated from earthly life to blessed eternity. Justice itself demands that these inclinations to sin, these betray als of the Redeemer should be weighed and evaluated. A judging and distinguishing are required in order to define the degree of a Christian soul's inclination to sin, in order to define what pre dominates in it - eternal life or eternal death. The unhypocritical Judgment of God awaits every Christian soul after its departure from the body, as the holy Apostle Paul has said: It is appointed unto men once to die, and after this the judgment (Heb. 9:27).

For the testing of souls as they pass through the spaces of the air there have been established by the dark powers separate judgment places and guards in a remarkable order. In the layers of the under-heaven, from earth to heaven itself, stand guarding legions of fallen spirits. Each division is in charge of a special form of sin and tests the soul in it when the soul reaches this division. The aerial demonic guards and judgment places are called in the Patristic writings the toll-houses, and the spirits who serve them are called the tax-collectors.16
The Orthodox Lives of the Saints contain numerous accounts of how the soul passes through the toll-houses after death. One such account of the Soldier Taxiotes (Lives of the Saints, March 28) is as follows:
When I was dying, I saw Ethiopians who appeared before me. Their appearance was very frightful; my soul beholding them was disturbed. Then I saw two splendid youths, and my soul leaped out into their arms. We began slowly to ascend in the air to the heights, as if flying, and we reached the toll-houses that guard the ascent and detain the soul of each man. Each toll-house tested a special form of sin: one lying, another envy, another pride; each sin has its own testers in the air. And I saw that the angels held all my good deed in a little chest; taking them out, they would compare them with my evil deeds. Thus we passed by all the toll-houses. And when, nearing the gates of heaven, we came to the toll-house of fornication, those who guard the way there detained me and presented to me all my fleshly deeds of fornication, committed from my childhood up to now. The angels who were leading me said: 'All the bodily sins which you committed in the city, God has forgiven because you repented of them.' To this my adversaries said to me: 'But when you left the city, in the village you committed adultery with a farmer's wife.' The angels, hearing this and finding no good deed which could be measured out for my sin, left me and went away. Then the evil spirits seized me and, overwhelming me with blows, led me down to earth. The earth opened, and I was let down by narrow and foul-smelling descents into the underground prison of hell.17
In an era when we hear so often that Christians who profess a belief in the Trinity are "all the same," whatever particular denomination they happen to belong to, our analysis of the Rapture makes it abundantly clear that this truism is simply not so. How, for example, do we account for these differences in eschatology between Orthodox Christianity and Protestantism?

While the specific doctrine of the Rapture is relatively recent, it is sim ply a symptom of the Protestant disease of vanity of the mind. A vainglory validated by their doctrine of sola scriptura (relying solely on the Bible as an authority), which allows for private interpretation of the Bible and replaces the mind of God, as expressed through the Church Fathers, with the mind of man. Saint Simeon the New Theologian writes of the dangers of private interpretation, "Especially do those who have gone astray in ignorance corrupt the meaning of divine Scripture and interpret it according to their lusts. For them the power of divine Scripture is inaccessible... One who has the whole of Divine Scripture on his lips cannot understand and attain to the mystical divine glory and power concealed in it if he will not fulfill the commandments of God and be vouchsafed to receive the Comforter, the Spirit of Truth Who might open to him the words of Divine Scripture as a book, and show him the mystical glory which is within them and might at the same time show the power and glory of God."18


Sister Anastasia
Conclusion in next issue.
Footnotes:

1. Lindsey, Hal. The Rapture, New York, NY: Bantam Books, 1985, p.46.
2. Theophylact, Blessed. The Explanation by Blessed Thee ph ylact of The Holy Gospel According to St. Matthew, Vol.1, House Springs, MO: Chrysostom Press, 1992, p.208.
3. Wacker, Grant, "Planning ahead: The enduring appeal of prophecy belief," Christian century, January 19, 1994, p.48.
4. Ibid., p.49.
5. The Rapture, op. cit., p.43.
6. Averky, Archbishop. The Apocalypse of St. John: An Orthodox Commentary, Platina, CA: St. Herman of Alaska Brotherhood, 1985, p.198.
7 Rose, Fr. Seraphim. Orthodoxy and the Religion of the Future, Platina, CA: St. Herman of Alaska Brotherhood, 1983, pp.214-215.
8. Graham, Billy. Approaching Hoofbeats: The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, Waco, TX: WORD Books, 1983, p.205.
9. Lindsey, Hal., Combat Faith, New York: Bantam Books, 1986, p.176.
10. Mastrantonis, Fr. George. Augsburg and Constantinople, Brookime, MA: Holy Cross Orthodox Press, 1982, p.270.
11. Graham, Billy. Angels: God's Secret Agents, Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Co., 1975, p.139.
12. Rallis, George, "Two Different Kinds of Resurrection in the New Testament," Orthodox Life, March-April, 1983, p.15.
13. Ibid., p. 17.
14. Cabasilas, St. Nicholas. The Life in Christ, Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir's Seminary Press, 1974, p.146-148.
15. St. Theodore of Studium, "That We Must Communicate in the Most Pure Mysteries with Pure Thoughts," Orthodox Life, March-April, 1969, p.30.
16. Rose, Fr. Seraphim. The Soul After Death, Platina, CA: St. Herman of Alaska Brotherhood, 1993, pp.65-66.
17. Ibid., pp.75-76.
18. Rose, Fr. Seraphim, "How to Read the Holy Scriptures," Orthodox America, March, 1989, p.11.