PDA

View Full Version : Maria Skobstov of Paris



Archimandrite Gregory
16-02-2004, 06:10 PM
Announced February 12, 2004
Mother Maria, her son Georges and Fr Dimitri Klepinin added to calendar

Today the Diocesan Council of the Russian Exarchate of Western Europe under the Ecumenical Patriarchate announced that the names of Mother Maria (Skobtsova), Fr Alexis Medvedkov, Fr Dimitri Klepinin, Georges Skobtsov and Ilya Fondaminsky have been added to the Synaxarion of saints of the Great Church; to go short that they have been canonised. Their common feast will be 20 July; the date of death of each will be their feast day as well. Four have been canonised as martyrs; Fr Alexis Medvedkov was a priest who died before the war and whose remains were found incorrupted some years later.

Saint Mother Maria of Paris, pray unto God for us!

TROPARION
Tone 4 - You became a bride of Christ, O venerable Mother, * and offered your body and soul to Him as a living sacrifice. * You exposed the evil side of humanity's ways * by allowing the light of the Resurrection to shine forth from you. * We celebrate your memory in love. * O Martyr and Confessor Maria, * pray to Christ our God that He may save our souls.
KONDAKION
Tone 6 - You became an instrument of divine love, O holy martyr Maria, * and taught us to love Christ with all our being. * You conquered evil by not submitting yourself into the hands of the destroyer of souls. * You drank from the cup of suffering. * The Creator accepted your death above any other sacrifice * and crowned you with the laurels of victory with His mighty hand. * Pray fervently that nothing may hinder us from fulfilling God's will * because you are a bright star shining in darkness!


PRAYER TO SAINT MARIA
MARTYR OF RAVENSBRUCK

O Blessed Maria, while you lived among us, you showed us that obedience to the will of God is the path to the Kingdom of heaven. Though the world was engulfed in war and had forgotten the ways of God, you never ceased to care for the sick, the homeless, the weak and the spiritually lost. You did not let the coldness of hatred enter into your being, but showed compassion toward all God's children. Now, O faithful witness of Christ our God, look down from your heavenly abode upon those who raise their voice to you in prayer. Intercede for us before the Throne of God, that we may be strengthened in love for God and love for our neighbor. Grant us the grace to see God's image in every human being. Through word and deed, you taught us to be patient in suffering, joyful in time of adversity, and to put one's trust in God's providence at all times, at every place and in each circumstance during our lifetime. Grant us to see our countless voluntary and involuntary sins. Renew our faith and trust in the Living God and His forgiveness. At the hour of our death, take us by the hand, granting us the courage to stand before the awesome judgement seat of Christ. May we be counted worthy of the joy of the eternal Kingdom awaiting all those Who love Christ with their whole hearts. Amen.

We extol you, O Saint Martyr Maria, and we honor your precious sufferings, which you endured for the sake of Christ our God.

Canon to Saint Mother Maria: http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Parthenon/4541/canon.html

Written by Saint Mother Maria of Paris:

Two Types of Love

by Mother Maria Skobtsova

TWO TYPES OF LOVE IN THE WORLD

There are two types of love in the world: one that takes and one that gives. This is common to all types of love -- not only towards man. Each person can love a friend, family, children, scholarship, art, motherland, one's idea, oneself, and even God -- from either of these two points of view. Even those types of love which by common acknowledgment are of the highest category can carry this dual character.
Take maternal love for example. A mother can often forget herself, sacrifice herself for her children. This does not as yet warrant recognition as Christian love for her children. One needs to ask the question: what is it that she loves in them? She may love her own reflection, her second youth, an expansion of her own "I" in other "I's" which become separated from the rest of the world's "we." She may love her own flesh and blood that she sees in them, traits of her own character, reflections of her tastes, the continuation of the family. Then it becomes unclear where is the principal difference between the egotistical self-love and a seemingly sacrificial love for her children, between "I" and "we." All this amounts to a passionate love of what is one's own, which restricts one's vision, forcing one to ignore the rest of the world, what is not one's own.

Such a mother will imagine that the worthiness of her own child is incomparable with the worthiness of other children, that his mishaps and illnesses are more severe than those of others and finally, that at times the well-being and success of other children can be sacrificed for the sake of the well-being and success of one's own. She will think that the whole world (herself included) are called to serve her child, feed him, quench his thirst, train him, make smooth all paths before him, deflect all obstacles and all rivals. This is a symptom of a passionate maternal love.

Only that maternal love is truly Christian which sees in her child a real image of God inherent not only in him but in all people, given to her in trust, as her responsibility, which she must develop and strengthen in him in preparation for the unavoidable life of sacrifice along the Christian path, for that cross-bearing challenge facing all Christians. With this kind of love the mother will be more aware of other children's misfortunes, she will be more attentive towards their neglect. Her relationship with the rest of humanity will be in Christ as the result of the presence of Christian love in her heart. This, of course, is the most radical example.

There is no doubt that the love towards every being is divided into these two types. One may passionately love one's motherland, working to make sure that she develops gloriously and victoriously, overcoming and destroying all her enemies. One can love her in the Christian manner, working to see that the image of Christ's truth is more and more evident within her. One can passionately love knowledge and art, aiming to see oneself expressed in them, to be proud about them. Or one can love them, being conscious of one's service, one's responsibility for the exercise of God's gifts in these spheres.

One can love one's idea of life only because it is one's own -- and to oppose it, enviously and jealously, to all other ideas. Even in this one can see the gift granted to me by God in order for me to serve His eternal truth during my earthly sojourn. One can love life itself passionately and sacrificially. One can even reflect upon death in two ways. One can direct two ways of love towards God. One can see Him as the heavenly protector of mine or our earthly desires and passions. The other love will humbly and sacrificially offer one's small human soul into His hands. Other than the appellation -- love -- other than external similarities, these two expressions of love have nothing in common.

In the light of this Christian love, what must be the ascetical challenge to man, what is this true asceticism which is inevitably called for by the very presence of spiritual life? Its measure is self-denying love for God and for our fellow man. But an asceticism which places one's own soul in the center of things, looking for its salvation, shielding it away from the world, narrowly moving towards a spiritual egocentrism and fearing to diminish oneself even by withholding love -- this is not Christian asceticism.

What can be used to measure and define the types of human lives? What are their prototypes, their primary symbols, their boundaries? This is the way of Godmanhood, Christ's path upon the earth. The Word became flesh, God became incarnate, born in a Bethlehem stable. This alone should have been fully sufficient to speak of the boundless, sacrificing, self-denying and self-disparaging love of Christ. Everything else is present in this. The Son of Man humbled His whole self, His whole divinity, His whole Divine nature and His whole Divine hypostasis beneath the arches of the Bethlehem cave. There are neither two Gods nor two Christs -- one who abides in blessedness within the bosom of the Holy Trinity and another, who assumed the image of a servant. The Only Son of God, the Logos, became Man, lowering Himself to humanity. His later activity -- preaching, miracles, prophesy, healing, enduring hunger and thirst, suffering Pilate's judgement, going the way of the cross to Golgotha and death -- all this is the path of His humbled humanity and along with Him the condescension of the Godhead to humanity.

What was Christ's love like? Did it withhold anything? Did it take note of or measure its spiritual gifts? What did it regret, where was it ever stingy? Christ's humanity was spit upon, struck, crucified. Christ's Divinity was fully incarnate to the end in his spit-upon, battered, degraded and crucified Humanity. The Cross -- an instrument of shameful death -- became a symbol of self-denying love for the world. And at no time nor place -- from Bethlehem to Golgotha, neither in sermons nor parables, neither in the miracles performed -- did Christ ever give any indication allowing one to think that he does not completely and fully, sacrifice Himself for the world's salvation, that He had some reservation, some Holy of Holiness which He would not want to nor need to offer. He offered His own Holy of Holies, His own Divinity, for the sins of the world, and this is precisely where lies His Divine and perfect love in its fullness.

This is the only conclusion we can come to from the whole of Christ's earthly ministry. But can the power of such love be Divine because God, in offering Himself, remains God, that is, He does not empty himself, does not perish in this fearsome sacrificial dissipation? Human love cannot be completely determined by the laws of Divine love because along this path man can become devastated and lose sight of what is important: the salvation of his soul.

But here one need only to be attentive to what He taught us. He said: "If any man would come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross." Self-denial is important, without which one cannot follow Him, without which there is no Christianity. Withhold nothing, lay aside not only material wealth but also spiritual wealth, changing everything into Christ's love, taking it up as one's cross. He also spoke -- not about Himself and not about His perfect love, but about the love which human imperfection can assume. "Greater love has no man than the one who lays down his soul for his friends." How miserly and greedy it is to understand the word "soul" here as "life." Christ spoke here precisely about the soul, about giving up one's inner life, about the complete and unconditional self-sacrifice as the example of the obligations of Christian love. Here again is no place for the harboring of one's spiritual treasures, here everything is given up.

His disciples likewise followed in His path. This is quite clear, in an almost paradoxical expression by Apostle Paul: "I wanted to be estranged from Christ to see my brothers saved." He said this, having stated that "It is no longer I who live but Christ who lives in me." For him such an estrangement from Christ is an estrangement from life not only in the transient, worldly sense of the word, but from the eternal and incorruptible life of the age to come.

There are enough such examples to let us know where Christianity leads us. Truly, love here does not seek its own, even if this be the salvation of one's own soul. This love takes everything from us, deprives us of everything, as if ravaging us. Where does it lead? To spiritual poverty. In the Beatitudes we are promised blessedness for being poor in spirit. This precept is so far removed from human understanding that some attempt to read the word "spirit" as a later interpolation and explain these words as a call for material poverty and a rejection of earthly benefits. Others almost fall into a fanaticism, understanding this as a call for intellectual poverty, a rejection of thought and of any kind of intellectual substance. How simply and clearly are these words interpreted in the context of other Evangelical texts. The poor in spirit is the one who lays down his soul for his friends, offering this spirit out of love, not withholding his spiritual treasures.

In Him Who calls us,
+Father Archimandrite Gregory, who asks for your holy prayers!

Melissa
17-02-2004, 01:33 AM
Thank you, Archimandrite Gregory, for the beautiful post re: especially Saint Mother Maria of Paris.
The treatise on the Two Types of Love is very meaningful; is it all right to download it?
Melissa

Donald Wescott
17-02-2004, 04:38 AM
Fr. Gregory,
Father Bless!

Thank you so much for posting this wonderful info on such a truly unique saint as Mother MAria. Her canonization was very timely for me as I intend to do a class project for my History of Modern Europe class on the women of Ravensbuck with a special emphasis on Mother Marai. Imagine my joy upon hearing of her canonization!

His unworthy servant,
Donald Eusebios

Archimandrite Gregory
17-02-2004, 02:23 PM
Dear Melissa, +May HE bless you! I sure you may download it and share it. Here is St. Mother Maria of Paris' own web-site (with many links): http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Parthenon/4541/ Enjoy!

May she pray unto god for us!

In His Holy Name,
+Father Archimandrite Gregory, who asks for your holy prayers!

Alec Lowly
21-07-2006, 01:55 AM
I was profoundly shocked today to receive the following from a well-informed and well-intentioned correspondent.


Mother Skobtsova's glorification is being quietly rescinded. I think that was already discussed here (.....). There was much politicking involved inher Cause and, in the end, it was pushed through by factious elements within the Paris Jurisdiction. Most, if not all, the Local Churches have refused to include her on their calendars. If I can locate more info on this I will send it to you, if you like.
Does anybody have any substantial information about this?

M.C. Steenberg
22-07-2006, 12:06 PM
I was profoundly shocked today to receive the following from a well-informed and well-intentioned correspondent.

Mother Skobtsova's glorification is being quietly rescinded. I think that was already discussed here (.....). There was much politicking involved inher Cause and, in the end, it was pushed through by factious elements within the Paris Jurisdiction. Most, if not all, the Local Churches have refused to include her on their calendars. If I can locate more info on this I will send it to you, if you like.

Does anybody have any substantial information about this?

I've not heard this, Alec. Mother Maria was and is (and likely always will remain) a controversial figure; but I have not heard of her canonisation being rescinded. There are plenty of controversial figures in the calendar of the saints.

I'd be curious if anyone else hsa heard such a rumour circulating.

INXC, Matthew