Rafael Daher
04-01-2007, 11:05 PM
Dear All,
I'm reading now the Summa Theologiaca, of St. Thomas Aquinas. I now that a lot of things in her texts are hetherodox, like his theory about eucharisty and his proofs of the existence of God.
But some things not seem so hetherodox, like his theorys about the creation, law, the state of the soul of Adam, the human acts and etc.
This link give to us the I Part of the Summa Theologica:
http://www.newadvent.org/summa/1.htm
II Part:
http://www.newadvent.org/summa/2.htm
http://www.newadvent.org/summa/3.htm
III Part:
http://www.newadvent.org/summa/3.htm
http://www.newadvent.org/summa/5.htm
Its propper to one orthodox study some things in the Summa, like these who not seem or not are hetherodox?
I'm reading now the Summa Theologiaca, of St. Thomas Aquinas. I now that a lot of things in her texts are hetherodox, like his theory about eucharisty and his proofs of the existence of God.
But some things not seem so hetherodox, like his theorys about the creation, law, the state of the soul of Adam, the human acts and etc.
This link give to us the I Part of the Summa Theologica:
http://www.newadvent.org/summa/1.htm
II Part:
http://www.newadvent.org/summa/2.htm
http://www.newadvent.org/summa/3.htm
III Part:
http://www.newadvent.org/summa/3.htm
http://www.newadvent.org/summa/5.htm
Its propper to one orthodox study some things in the Summa, like these who not seem or not are hetherodox?