PDA

View Full Version : The sacraments: 'the earnest expectation of the creation' and the divine light



RichardWorthington
17-02-2008, 05:58 PM
Based on what I have read and heard, especially regarding the Eucharist, for some time now I have been toying with the following idea and wondered what people thought:

Properly speaking, there is only one valid sacrament: the one where the Uncreated Divine Light appears.

This is not to say that when the Divine Light does not appear that we are robbed of God’s loving grace (far from it!), but merely that we should not consider the Church primarily as a worldly organisation, as an administer of ‘portions’ of grace. Of course, due to human weakness (which I also have!), the Divine Light does not appear in any of the sacraments/mysteries of the Church - except to chosen holy individuals. However, it dawned on me that most of the problems with all the churches (Orthodox or other) stem from the notion that the ‘concession to human weakness’ was considered to be almost the totality of what Christ gave to humanity as the Church. This ‘concession to human weakness’ is the outward form of certain possible aspects of the churches in the world: ‘pharisaical’ use of canon law, organisations of a ladder of a seemingly vain-glorious ascent, at times claiming to act in the place of an absent Christ, thinking that reading a certain book ("the Bible") magically converts people, and so on.

In this worldly view, the grace of the sacraments merely helps us ‘on our way’. While this is true, it seems to be forgotten that by cooperating with grace we can actually attain to being as createdly perfect as God is perfect. When this happens, then deification becomes a reality and the sacraments can be seen to take on their true role: delivering the creation "from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God" (Romans 8:21). At least, this is my idea - but as I know that this is an innovation, I would like to check it with others: is it an innovation which clarifies the reality of the Church, or an innovation which detracts from the Church’s glory?

Going through the standard list of seven sacraments (order as in the Hapgood translation of the service books, except for the Liturgy) reveals the following:


1) Baptism: After the person has been baptised, they are clothed in a white garment. However, when the priest puts this on he says, "The servant of God N is clothed with the robe of righteousness", and then the choir sing, "Vouchsafe unto me the robe of light, O thou who clothest thyself with light as with a garment, Christ our God, plenteous in mercy." (Hapgood, p. 280)

2) Chrismation: When the Holy Chrism is applied the priest says, "The seal and gift of the Holy Spirit" (Hapgood p 281), which is a reference to such verses as, "you were sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise" (Ephesians 1:13). Yet the "Promise of the Father" is what was sent to the Apostles on Pentecost, "for John truly baptized with water, but you shall be baptized with the Holy Spirit not many days from now" (Acts 1:4-5), and as the Forerunner himself said, "He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire" (Luke 3:16).

3) Eucharist (Liturgy): At the end we sing, "We have seen the true Light": see this post (http://www.monachos.net/forum/showthread.php?p=54920#post54920) for more.

4) Confession: In Psalm 51, said at the start, it is written, "Purge me with hyssop, and I shall be clean: wash me, and I shall be whiter than snow" (Psalm 51:7). This ‘snowy whiteness’ is mentioned in a prayer for the Lesser blessing of the waters, "Do thou … who hast granted unto us to clothe ourselves in the garment of snowy whiteness by water and the Spirit" (Hapgood, p. 475). This sacrament is not properly a ‘second Baptism’, but merely a re-manifestation of our one and only Holy Baptism of Light.

5) Marriage: During the service the priest asks that "they may shine like the stars of heaven, in thee, our God" (Hapgood p. 296). However, I was so impressed with what I read there that I have put other similar ideas in a new thread (http://www.monachos.net/forum/showthread.php?p=59321#post59321).

6) Ordination: At the start of the setting apart of Readers ("the first degree in the Priesthood"), the Bishop prays, "Do thou, the same Lord, array in thy fair and spotless vesture this thy servant … that he may be illumined"; the Reader is then at the end clothed in his tunic (Hapgood p. 306, 308).

Further, at the ordination of a bishop the troparion and kontakion for Pentecost are sung, the kontakion being, "When the Most High came down and confused the tongues, He divided the nations; But when He distributed the tongues of fire, He called all to unity. Therefore, with one voice, we glorify the all-Holy Spirit!" After this, the presiding bishop prays, "strengthen him by the inspiration and power and grace of thy Holy Spirit, as thou didst strengthen thy holy Apostles and Prophets" (Hapgood p 324-hymn OCA translation, p 329).

7) Anointing of the Sick: I have not read through this particularly, as the Divine Light would manifest Himself through the actual required healing if not directly due to our weakness. Jesus was asked, "Are You the Coming One, or do we look for another?", to which He replied, "the blind see, the lame walk, the lepers are cleansed, the deaf hear, the dead are raised, the poor have the gospel preached to them" (Luke 7:20-22); if no healing takes place, then to what extent are those outside entitled to ask us, "Is this the Church, or do we look for another"?

Surely the sacraments of the Church are more than nice and pleasant displays of ‘relig-ianity’?


I saw a new heaven and a new earth
Revelation 21:1

Richard

Tim Grass
17-02-2008, 10:59 PM
Richard.... I think you're trying to make way, way to much out of the divine Light.

--tim

Antonios
18-02-2008, 04:02 AM
Surely the sacraments of the Church are more than nice and pleasant displays of ‘relig-ianity’?



Extremely so, literally life-saving!

RichardWorthington
03-04-2008, 04:58 PM
Richard.... I think you're trying to make way, way too much out of the divine Light.


Dear Tim,

Thank you for replying to my little thread.

What you express is exactly what I found in Orthodoxy: deification is kept in a nice shiny box on the shelf. When Orthodoxy wants to show its uniqueness to the West it brings it out and opens it up, but inside are mainly ancient Greek words and complicated English phrases. Anything useful is explained away to make it fit into the un-Orthodox framework of the West, thereby robbing it of its strength.

However, when dealing with church matters and theology in general, deification is totally ignored. Look at the teaching on ‘Apostolic Succession’: who will consider that the bishops should actually be real apostles ("am I not an apostle? Have I not seen Jesus Christ our Lord?") as opposed to ‘sacramental’ apostles only? I won’t begin on certain views of free will. The ‘Western Influence’ of Orthodoxy is still alive today.

Therefore I do agree with you. You are giving exactly the teaching of the modern Orthodox Church, which has been so infiltrated by Western non-Orthodox teachings and spirituality that there is indeed a "layer of dust" on Orthodoxy, as Fr Lev Gillet said (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lev_Gillet). The real problem is that the layer of dust is far deeper than he could ever have imagined. That is why I make no distinction between ‘modernists’ and ‘traditionalists’, Parisian Orthodoxy and ROCOR Orthodoxy, New Calendarists and Old Calendarists, Ecumenist and Fanatic:

I honour the memory of Fr lev Gillet;
I venerate Fr Seraphim Rose;
But I bow down, worship, and adore the God of deification as proclaimed by Fr John Romanides.

I recently saw my ‘spiritual father’, Fr Maximos Lavriotes of Mt Athos who learnt from Fr John Romanides. I wanted to check my thoughts, which were based upon his teachings to me. I asked him, "Surely it is true to say that there is only one valid sacrament, the one where the divine Light appears?" "Yes", he replied. End of theological discussion.

Many saints have had the vision of the divine Light during the Eucharist. This is the norm for Christians; our lack of love for Christ should never be the standard of the Church’s self-expression. St Gregory Palamas was fighting against such an ignorant sub-standard view of the Church, from which many errors have been produced in the West.



"It is within our body, grafted on to the body of Christ by baptism and the Eucharist, that the divine light shines."

So comments Fr John Meyendorff about St Gregory Palamas’s teaching ("A Study of Gregory Palamas", page 152). (I did hear that Fr John Romanides fell out with Fr John Meyendorff over this book, but am not exactly sure of the details.)




I who am straw partake of fire,
And, strange wonder!
I am ineffably bedewed,
Like the bush of old
Which burnt without being consumed.

Prayer of St. Symeon the New Theologian before Communion (http://www.myriobiblos.gr/texts/english/prayerbook/main.htm)



The true aim of our Christian life consists of the acquisition of the Holy Spirit of God.
St Seraphim of Sarov

Tim, thank you again. I am sincere towards you, it is just that the ‘Matrix’ of the western spirit is everywhere, but I have been told of another Spirit, in Holy Orthodoxy.

Richard

Owen Jones
04-04-2008, 02:39 PM
I must confess, and I have only been Orthodox for 17 years, that I have never heard a sermon on deification or the uncreated light. Never. Never have I heard such an exalted sermon that connects my very mundane life to the actual lives of the saints in any meaningful way. I have heard a couple of very inspiring sermons about saints lives (in a parish I was visiting, a parish comprised entirely of American converts), but even there, I don't recall the essential doctrine of deification being mentioned. Perhaps my memory does not serve well. But this most essential doctrine for all Orthodox Christians seems to have been expunged. And I think the result of singing, "we have seen the True Light," is that we think they are wonderful words without a whole lot of personal significance. Frustrating...

Father David Moser
04-04-2008, 04:32 PM
I recently saw my ‘spiritual father’, Fr Maximos Lavriotes of Mt Athos who learnt from Fr John Romanides. I wanted to check my thoughts, which were based upon his teachings to me. I asked him, "Surely it is true to say that there is only one valid sacrament, the one where the divine Light appears?" "Yes", he replied. End of theological discussion.

This comment has stayed with me and I have had the time to consider it. At first it seemed a little "over the top" as it were, but as I pondered the meaning of a sacrament it became more and more real. Fr Sophrony writes in his book "On Prayer" that "Grace is God's life and He gives His life to them who strive for likeness to Him." The common definition of a sacrament is that it is a particular channel or vehicle by which God bestows His grace upon us. Thus we can say that whenever a true sacrament is celebrated, Heaven opens and the life of the Holy Trinity descends upon us. The essential manifestation of this life is the Divine Light and thus is inseperable from the appearance of the life of the Trinity. If it is the life of the Trinity that is bestowed upon us in the sacraments then it is also inevitable that the Divine Light is apparent in that sacrament.

The next question, however, that must be asked is: "Must one be able to see the Divine Light that appears in the sacrament in order for it to be valid?" To which the answer must be no, for to say that the "validity" or efficacy of a sacrament is dependent upon our own holiness (or lack thereof) is the heresy of docetism. Thus, in the sacraments, the Divine Light must always be present, however, many of us remain blind to it. Only those who are given the mercy to see that light will actually perceive it, the rest of us have to act in faith.



Many saints have had the vision of the divine Light during the Eucharist. This is the norm for Christians; our lack of love for Christ should never be the standard of the Church’s self-expression. St Gregory Palamas was fighting against such an ignorant sub-standard view of the Church, from which many errors have been produced in the West.


Yes, I quite agree that if we were all as holy as we ought to be, if we all had been purified by ascetic labor and had cleared and developed our spiritual senses to the point of being fully functional that we too would see the Divine Light not only at each and every Eucharist, but also at each and every baptism, chrismation, confession, ordination and so on. But alas we are sinners and we struggle to simply grasp with faith the life and grace that God gives. The fact that we do not see the Divine Light does not invalidate a sacrament, but simply serves to point up our own imperfection and ought to spur us on to greater efforts to acquire the Holy Spirit. Just knowing that the Divine Light is there and that we apprehend it not with our senses but by faith is important. Remember the words of our Lord, "Thomas, because thou has seen me, thou hast believed: blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed."

Fr David Moser

Owen Jones
05-04-2008, 02:20 AM
Yes, of course, which is why good preaching must connect us with Christ and with the experience of saints who have seen God in a way that does not cause us to despair of our own failings. We need to know that it is possible to continuously make progress in that direction. It's not all or nothing.