PDA

View Full Version : The 'Arabic' canons of Nicaea?



Daniel Smith
12-04-2009, 09:45 AM
What is the Orthodox church's position toward the so called arabic canons attributed to Nicea (THe first one)? I ask, because canon xxxix is a little annoying...

CANON XXXIX.
"Of the care and power which a Patriarch has over the bishops and archbishops of his patriarchate; and of the primacy of the Bishop of Rome over all.
Let the patriarch consider what things are done by the archbishops and bishops in their provinces; and if he shall find anything done by them otherwise than it should be, let him change it, and order it, as seemeth him fit: for he is the father of all, and they are his sons. And although the archbishop be among the bishops as an elder brother, who hath the care of his brethren, and to whom they owe obedience because he is over them; yet the patriarch is to all those who are under his power, just as he who holds the seat of Rome, is the head and prince of all patriarchs; in-asmuch as he is first, as was Peter, to whom power is given over all Christian princes, and over all their peoples, as he who is the Vicar of Christ our Lord over all peoples and over the whole Christian Church, and whoever shall contradict this, is excommunicated by the Synod.(1)
[I add Canon XXXVII. of Echellensis's Nova Versio LXXXIV. Arabic. Canonum Conc. Nicoeni, that the reader may compare it with the foregoing.]
Let there be only four patriarchs in the whole world as there are four writers of the Gospel, and four rivers, etc. And let there be a prince and chief over them, the lord of the see of the Divine Peter at Rome, according as the Apostles commanded. And after him the lord of the great Alexandria, which is the see of Mark. And the third is the lord of Ephesus, which is the see of John the Divine who speaks divine things. And the fourth and last is my lord of Antioch, which is another see of Peter. And let all the bishops be divided under the hands of these four patriarchs; and the bishops of the little towns which are under the dominion of the great cities let them be under the authority of these metropolitans. But let every metropolitan of these great cities appoint the bishops of his province, but let none of the bishops appoint him, for he is greater than they. Therefore let every man know his own rank, and let him not usurp the rank of another. And whosoever shall contradict this law which we have established the Fathers of the Synod subject him to anathema.(2) "

I am converting from Roman Heterodoxy to Catholic Orthodoxy and I really want this to be false. Know what I mean? SO does anyone know the status of these canons? THe Arabic Canons attributed to Nicea?

POpery...grrr.... :)

Vasiliki D.
13-04-2009, 03:54 AM
What is the Orthodox church's position toward the so called arabic canons attributed to Nicea (THe first one)? I ask, because canon xxxix is a little annoying...

CANON XXXIX.

"Of the care and power which a Patriarch has over the bishops and archbishops of his patriarchate; and of the primacy of the Bishop of Rome over all. Let the patriarch consider what things are done by the archbishops and bishops in their provinces; and if he shall find anything done by them otherwise than it should be, let him change it, and order it, as seemeth him fit: for he is the father of all, and they are his sons. And although the archbishop be among the bishops as an elder brother, who hath the care of his brethren, and to whom they owe obedience because he is over them; yet the patriarch is to all those who are under his power, just as he who holds the seat of Rome, is the head and prince of all patriarchs; in-asmuch as he is first, as was Peter, to whom power is given over all Christian princes, and over all their peoples, as he who is the Vicar of Christ our Lord over all peoples and over the whole Christian Church, and whoever shall contradict this, is excommunicated by the Synod.(1)



[I]Let there be only four patriarchs in the whole world as there are four writers of the Gospel, and four rivers, etc. And let there be a prince and chief over them, the lord of the see of the Divine Peter at Rome, according as the Apostles commanded. And after him the lord of the great Alexandria, which is the see of Mark. And the third is the lord of Ephesus, which is the see of John the Divine who speaks divine things. And the fourth and last is my lord of Antioch, which is another see of Peter. And let all the bishops be divided under the hands of these four patriarchs; and the bishops of the little towns which are under the dominion of the great cities let them be under the authority of these metropolitans. But let every metropolitan of these great cities appoint the bishops of his province, but let none of the bishops appoint him, for he is greater than they. Therefore let every man know his own rank, and let him not usurp the rank of another. And whosoever shall contradict this law which we have established the Fathers of the Synod subject him to anathema.(2) "

I am converting from Roman Heterodoxy to Catholic Orthodoxy and I really want this to be false. Know what I mean? SO does anyone know the status of these canons? THe Arabic Canons attributed to Nicea?

POpery...grrr.... :)

Well, no, i dont know what you mean .. can you perhaps explain WHAT it is that annoys you?

To be honest, I quite like hierarchical succession and order since God too liked order (so many examples of this in Scripture). I also kind of found it fascinating that there should only be FOUR Patriarchs to keep in line with the FOUR writers of the Gospels - a fascinating point ... Scripture loves its numbers and the symbolism of numbers so reading that was also interesting food for thought.

Daniel Smith
13-04-2009, 04:44 PM
this canon appears to be a clear move by some to give papal primacy wecumenical sanction. It is one thing to be first in honor and another to claim ecclesial supremacy with a xorresponding authority. So: do the
Orthodox accept the Arabic canons as ecumenical?

Daniel Smith
18-04-2009, 12:48 AM
So does orthodoxy accept the Arabic canons of nicea?

Kosta
18-04-2009, 06:14 AM
No this canon is not recognized by Orthodoxy. The church catholic has always maintained 20 nicean canons. The so-called arabic canons are frauds of much later origin. For instance in 325 a.d. the term 'patriarchate' was not yet in use.

Another arabic canon claims that the archbishop of Cyprus is under the authority of the Antiochan Patriarchate(canon 37). Completely false, the Church of Cyprus has always been autocephalous but in the late 4th century Antioch attempted to annex it. Antioch attempted to ordain their own bishops for Cyprus but the Cypriot synod protested and brought it to the attention of the Ephesian council. The council of Ephesus in 431 rejected this attempt and preserved the ANCIENT CUSTOM of autocephaly in canon 8 of Ephesus:
http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf214.x.xvi.xii.html